Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xperia XZ Premium's score of 79.8. Galaxy Fold's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than the Xperia XZ Premium. Xperia XZ Premium features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel density and a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels.
Galaxy Fold has a little faster processing unit than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better battery life than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 3230mAh. Sony Xperia XZ Premium shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low light situations and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a lot better 19 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.