Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, having a 97.6 score against 79. The Galaxy Fold is a newer and thinner device than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it's also notably heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo, providing the user lots of additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a way more MP camera.
Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy Fold has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.