Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, having a general score of 97.6 against 82.2. Galaxy Fold is a newer and a lot thinner cellphone than Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it is somewhat heavier. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840px and way more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a way better resolution back camera.
Galaxy Fold features improved battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3540mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.