Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. The Galaxy Fold is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xperia XZs, but it's much heavier. The Xperia XZs counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display and a way lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Xperia XZs counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, better 960 fps video frame rate and a camera with a way higher 19 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features a way better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than the Sony Xperia XZs, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.