Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi 14T, getting a 97.6 score against 83.7. The Galaxy Fold body is thinner than Xiaomi 14T, but it is incredibly heavier and was released 5 years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi 14T has Android 14 version, providing you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior CPU than Xiaomi 14T. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Xiaomi 14T features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number per inch in the screen and a quite better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
Xiaomi 14T features a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi 14T also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy Fold features a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi 14T, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi 14T features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.