Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Silver |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, with a overall score of 97.6 against 82.3. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10. Even though Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy Fold's body is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.