Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 score. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro were released with only 1 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is noticeably heavier but much thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a CPU that is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy Fold, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.