Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and White |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's 78.7 overall score. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is noticeably older and much heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's body is still way thinner. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12, providing you a lot of extra features and better performance.
Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number in each inch of display, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px. Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.