Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro's score of 90. Galaxy Fold's design is much thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, but it is extremely heavier and was released only 12 months before. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and video, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.