Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 81.4. Although the Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Fold's design is a little bit thinner but also much heavier. These phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.