Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's global score of 82.2. Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly heavier but way thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, and both were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.