Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's general score of 82.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly thinner but a lot heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, giving a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.