Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Mi A3's 79.2 score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is somewhat thinner but way heavier than Xiaomi Mi A3, and both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better pixel density, a lot better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution and a larger display.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a way more megapixels back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.