Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Max, having a 97.6 score against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a incredibly newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Max, although it's extremely heavier. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bit bigger display, a just a little higher display density and a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a worse video definition and a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments. The Xiaomi Mi Max features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4850mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.