Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 81.2. Although Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Fold also has a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.