Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, getting a 97.6 score against 83.8. Although the Galaxy Fold is way heavier than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same sensor size and a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Galaxy Fold also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.