Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, getting a 97.6 score against 83.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, it's thinner and newer. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.