Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black |
| -- | Titanium |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, getting a general score of 97.6 against 88.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold design is heavier but notably thinner. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Fold. They have 8 cpu cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a higher 2088 x 2250px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha and Galaxy Fold count with incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have equal 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also counts with a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.