Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2912 x 1224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 458 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4780mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mix Flip's 83.2 overall score. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Fold is way older and much heavier than the Xiaomi Mix Flip, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mix Flip has Android 14, so it gives you some extra features.
Xiaomi Mix Flip has a lot better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1224 x 2912 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mix Flip, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mix Flip. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Mix Flip counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4780mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh. The Xiaomi Mix Flip shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.