Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-03-13 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro's score of 80.5. Even though the Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy Fold body is heavier but thinner than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro. Both phones in this review have the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.