Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's global score of 87.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and increased performance. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro were released only 8 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly heavier but also way thinner.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.