Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Poco F3, with a general score of 97.6 against 87.3. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco F3 has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Poco F3, it's design is still thinner.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Poco F3 features a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F3 features a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a back camera with a way better 48 MP resolution and a much bigger sensor.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.