Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco F4's global score of 87.5. The Galaxy Fold construction is a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco F4, although it is incredibly heavier and was released 3 years before. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco F4 has Android 12, so it provides some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco F4 features a much better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel number in each inch of display. The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 features just a little better performance than Galaxy Fold, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.