Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with a general score of 97.6 against 79.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably older and notably heavier than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, it's construction is still incredibly thinner. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13, offering some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy Fold shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.