Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, having a 97.6 score against 78.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and way heavier than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's body is still much thinner. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy Fold, because although the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.