Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco X2's global score of 79.3. The Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly heavier but noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Poco X2, and both were released only a few months apart. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Poco X2 and Samsung Galaxy Fold count with really similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a much tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.