Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a global score of 97.6 against 81.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy Fold's design is way thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it's way heavier and was released about a year before.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a lot tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.