Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T's score of 78.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's body is still extremely thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Redmi 9T count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.