Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 general score. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11, offering a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Although Galaxy Fold is older and notably heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera and a way tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.