Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 82.4. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's design is still thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit better pixel count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.