Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's score of 78.2. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's design is still somewhat thinner. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back facing camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.