Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, with a general score of 97.6 against 86.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is somewhat thinner but heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers some extra features.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.