Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a score of 97.6 against 77.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a notably heavier but somewhat thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.