Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, having a general score of 97.6 against 91.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a incredibly older and notably heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, but Samsung was able to make it much thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has Android 12 version, so it offers lots of additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.