Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having a global score of 97.6 against 75.7. The Galaxy Fold body is thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it is heavier and was released 3 years before. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.