Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, with a 97.6 score against 83.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version, providing the user a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2710.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Fold, because although it has only 256 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.