Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's 75.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro counts with a display that's just as good as Galaxy Fold's screen, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Fold also has a much better (4K) video definition and a much larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold features just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.