Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 77.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo, so it provides you some additional features. Even though the Galaxy Fold is way heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it's thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Fold shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a lot bigger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.