Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's global score of 80.3. Although the Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with better video frame rate, a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.