Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting a 97.6 score against 83. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but Samsung managed to make it extremely thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.