Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 2.3.3, 2.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2011-01-26 | 2018-03-30 |
| 4.35 x 2.26 x 0.48 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | -- |
| $ 95.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 180 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.11 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 161,79 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.02 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 610 hours standby time 10.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Tempo Go has a general score of 50.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Gio's 47.3 global score. The ZTE Tempo Go is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also much thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Gio. These devices use Android OS, but ZTE Tempo Go has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy Gio has Android 2.3.3 version.
The ZTE Tempo Go has a better processing power than Galaxy Gio, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 more cores. The Galaxy Gio counts with just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Tempo Go, although it has a really smaller display, a way lower resolution of 480 x 320px and a little worse pixels density.
The ZTE Tempo Go shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Gio, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much higher video resolution. ZTE Tempo Go has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Gio, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has more internal memory.
The ZTE Tempo Go has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Gio, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1350mAh.
The ZTE Tempo Go is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.