Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.70 x 2.84 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.2 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime, with a 71.5 score against 65.5. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime, but it is somewhat lighter. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime has Android 4.4.4.
The Galaxy Grand Prime has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a much better graphics co-processor working at 450 megahertz, a 64 bits processor and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1280 x 720 resolution and a higher pixel number per inch of display.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Grand Prime, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has 32 GB internal memory. Galaxy S III Cricket shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Grand Prime. Both of them have the same resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy Grand Prime has greater battery life than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.