Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-07-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is better than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), with a general score of 80 against 71.8. Google Pixel 3's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), but it is just a bit lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a way higher pixels count per screen inch and a quite bigger screen. Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy J5 (2017) has just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.