Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-07-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is better than the Galaxy J5 (2017)'s 71.8 score. Google Pixel 4's design is extremely newer than Galaxy J5 (2017)'s, but it is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 features a faster processor than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a quite bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a lot greater pixels number per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 4 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy J5 (2017) features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.