Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)'s 71.8 score. The LG V10 design is older, just a bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) has a bit better CPU than LG V10, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores (although slower).
The LG V10 features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a lot greater pixels amount per inch in the display and a little bigger display. The LG V10 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V10 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with more MP.
The LG V10's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy J5 (2017) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.