Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a lot better than Galaxy J5 (2017)'s score of 71.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is a lot newer than Galaxy J5 (2017)'s, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy J5 (2017) counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a back facing camera with much more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.