Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a lot better than Galaxy J5 (2017)'s overall score of 71.8. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier device than Galaxy J5 (2017), but both are 0.31inches thick. Motorola razr (2020) has just a little better processing power than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a better number of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a much better 876 x 2142px resolution. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better resolution. The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.