Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Galaxy J5 (2017), with a 90.8 score against 71.8. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is way newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the Galaxy J5 (2017). Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better performance than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better looking display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.