Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy J5 (2017), having a general score of 95.4 against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is extremely newer than the Galaxy J5 (2017)'s, but it's heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a much bigger screen, a much higher display density and a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a much more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.