Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.59 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a lot better than Galaxy J5, with a general score of 80 against 66. The Google Pixel 3 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy J5, but it's just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy J5, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J5, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 3 has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy J5, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J5, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light environments. Google Pixel 3 has a little better battery duration than Galaxy J5, because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.